"Islam is yours, that is why you don't recognize it" ~ Prophet Noble Drew Ali
We rise giving all praise to Allah and the highest honors to his Prophet, Noble Drew Ali. We extend those honors to the Harbinger and Forerunner of the Prophet, Marcus M. Garvey. We extend honors to all true and Divine Prophets, Buddha, Confucius, Jesus & Mohammed. We extend honors to you all for when man honors man, he honors his Father, God Allah.
Islam, peace and greetings to you all. Many Mohammedan Moslems believe that Islam was founded with the Prophet Mohammed. The Koran of Prophet Mohammed itself at 5:3 says "This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion." (Sahih International). Mohammedan Moslems also selfishly agree, no matter which branch they profess, that Mohammed was Allah's last Prophet. This can be found no where in the Koran of Mohammed. They misinterpret the use of the phrase "seal of the prophet" to support their own dogmatic view. Do they think that Allah would neglect his first human creation, the Moors, whom they falsely call black people? Do they not pause for a moment to think that Allah would have to send one to us speaking our own language and giving us that which was needed for these days and times? Does not the very Koran of Mohammed forbid those from questioning Allah's authority concerning whom he sends as Prophets, messengers, and warners? Do they accept some words and verses of the Koran of Muhammad while ignoring others? Are they then hypocrites?
40:34 And indeed Yusuf (Joseph) did come to you, in times gone by, with clear signs, but you ceased not to doubt in that which he did bring to you, till when he died you said: "No Messenger will Allāh send after him." Thus Allāh leaves astray him who is a Musrif (a polytheist, oppressor, a criminal, sinner who commit great sins) and a Murtāb (one who doubts Allāh's Warning and His Oneness).
14:4. And We did not send any messenger except [speaking] in the language of his people to state clearly for them, and Allah sends astray [thereby] whom He wills and guides whom He wills. And He is the Exalted in Might, the Wise.
10:47 And for every Ummah (a community or a nation), there is a Messenger; when their Messenger comes, the matter will be judged between them with justice, and they will not be wronged.”
2:87. We gave Moses the Book and followed him up with a succession of messengers; We gave Jesus the son of Mary Clear (Signs) and strengthened him with the Holy Spirit. Is it that whenever there comes to you a messenger with what ye yourselves desire not, ye are puffed up with pride? Some ye called impostors, and others ye slay!
22:67. To every people have we appointed rites and ceremonies which they follow: let them not then dispute with thee on the matter, but do invite them to thy lord: for thou art assuredly on the right way.
49:17 They presume to lay thee under an obligation by becoming Moslems. Say: Lay me not under an obligation BY YOUR ISLAM; rather Allah lays you under an obligation by guiding you to the faith, if you are truthful. [emphasis mines]
It is a well established fact that the "EL" that the Moorish American Moslems annex on their names (making them theophoric in representation), is the source of the word Allah and thus, was the God of all of the ancient world. Taking from page 31 of the "Book of God" by Wesley Muhammad, the foremost imminent scholar of Islam among us, citing several confirming sources, says that in ancient ruins of Southern Arabia, which became the center of the Moorish rule in Arabia, the name Allah is found in the Himyaritic inscriptions. Himyar probably derives from the same Canaanite source of Ham which means dark or dusky and possibly a play on the word Ham. Phillip Hitti who wrote the book HIstory of the Arabs, on page 100 notes that:
"Allah...was the principle...deity of Makkah. The name is an ancient one. it occurs in two South Arabic inscriptions, one a Minaean found at Al-Ula and the other Sabaen, but abounds in the form HLH in the Lihyanite inscriptions of the fifth century BC. Lihyan, who evidently got the god from Syria, was the first center of the worship of this deity in Arabia. The name occurs as Hallah in the Safa inscriptions five centuries before Islam."
Evidence of the worship of Allah in ancient Arabia has been found in both Norther and Southern Arabia. Four hundred Lihynanite and Dedanite inscriptions found revealed that some were invocations to Allah. F.V. Winnet, who has translated these inscriptions, list some of them in his article "Allah before Islam" published in The Moslem world in 1938. These examples, found in the fifth century B.C. reads:
O Allah, permit me to accomplish salvation...
O Allah, God without offspring, Greeting
O Allah, guide me that I may attain prosperity...
O Allah, God without offspring, knower of men...
These are the ancient Moabites who are the founders of the Holy City of Mecca who in some years after, would go and found the city of Marab (Mo'ab) in North Africa that we know of today as Morocco. It was the Moabites who gave birth to the languages of Syriac, Aramaic, and the Arabic we have today. These Moabites were the founders of Egypt and represented the last remnant of the true Egyptian colonies, those of Hamath, the seed of Mitsraim. Diodorus the Sicilian, Book I, [28, 1-4], tells of an Egyptian colony at what he cited as present-day Moab, which is the origin of the Moors, Hagarenes (called Arabs today) and Jews who collaborated to govern in Iberia. He said:
"... that the nation of the Colchi in Pontus and that of the Jews, which lies between Arabia and Syria, were founded as colonies by certain emigrants from their country [Egypt]; and this is the reason why it is long-established institution among these two peoples to circumcise their male children, the custom having been brought over from Egypt."
These are the ancient Moabites or Moors who came from the Asiatic nations and this is confirmed by several sources as well where we find the Moslem armies who conquered Spain cited as Moors, Moabites [who are the Moors], Saracens, Ethiopians [which is descriptive of a Moor], Parthians, Africans, Persians Hagarenes, pagans, Ishmaelites, Chaldeans [Cushites which would be the same as Ethiopians], and Amorites as can be shown referenced with sources on this website. This is the collective of those whom were called Moors, Hagarenes and Saracens and why Moors have a picture of SULTAN ABDUL AZIZ IBU SUAD within the pages of our Moorish Koran. It stems from an ancient relationship that most do not understand until now. In the book Egyptian Romany by Mostaffa Goddalla, we read:
“The Moabi region was also the source of the Arabic, Hebrew, and Aramaic/Syriac dialects, which were offshoots of the Ancient Egypt language. Ibn Hazm (died 1064), the medieval Arabic scholar of Córdoba, recognized that Aramaic/Syriac, Hebrew, and Arabic were kindred dialects, derived from the Mudar, the dialect in which the Koran had been disclosed.
There are several references that proves without a shadow of a doubt that the language that the Koran of Mohammed was revealed in, was in fact the Moabite language called Mudar. Anwar Chejne, an eminent Islamic scholar and historian, who wrote books like Muslim Spain, Its History And Culture, says this in his book Arabic Language, on pages 34-35 that:
“As mentioned before, the original home of Arabic – the Arabic of the Qur’ān and of literature – may be traced to the northwestern region of the Arabian Peninsula… The northern region is regarded as the home of the Mudar language, the forerunner of Arabic; and the southern region is considered the locus of the Himyarite language spoken by the Yemenites and their neighbors. This division became more pronounced after the rise and expansion of Islām, when the Mudar language was accorded supreme attributes and superior qualities. Such views were rationalized by pointing to the fact that the Qur’ān was revealed in one of the Mudar dialects, the dialect of the Quraysh tribe.”
To go back even further, the racist Islamic scholar Ibn Khaldun, in his 13th century works Muqaddima says the same exact thing proving that this source is authentic and contemporary. He said:
"The Mudar language was thus transformed into another language.Now, the Qur'an was revealed in the language of the Mudar, and the Prophetical traditions were transmitted in it, and both the Qur'an and the traditions are the basis of Islam. It was feared that, as a result of the disappearance of the Mudar Moabite language in which they were revealed, they themselves might be forgotten and no longer be understood."
Writers like George G.M. James noted the specific relationship with the Egyptians and the Moabites whom are the Moors in his book Stolen Legacy. The very name Islam can be traced back to ancient Egypt used in the same exact manner that Moorish American Moslems use Islam, as a Peace Greeting because Islam means "peace". Mohammedans have given the expression Islam as the meaning of "submission" but this is not what Islam means, it means peace. Ancient languages of our ancestors and etymological traces trumps conflation.
Prophet Noble Drew Ali said that he was going to remove the veil off of all secret organizations and his arrival marked the day that all light would be revealed. If the Mohammedan Moslems of Moorish persuasion (so called black Muslims) knew the truth of the history of Islam, then they would understand the nature of the founder of what we call the Mohammedan religion because Islam does not start with him, it spreads with him, transmitted in the language of the Moabites, then, the Arabic language was created to better spread it to those who spoke similar dialects in a form that they could absorb and collectively understand. Godalla in his Egyptian Romany says "The Ancient Egyptian-controlled Moabi region is regarded as the home of the Mudar language, the forerunner of Arabic. The name Mudar is an abbreviated form of the ancient Egyptian term, Medu-Neter, meaning the words/language of angels/gods. It is no accident that Moslems say that Arabic is the “language of Angels”, in imitation of the Ancient Egyptian Medu Neter. The people of this ancient Egyptian colony (Moabi) spoke and wrote the Egyptian language. Scripts found in the Moabi region look exactly like the Ancient Egyptian demotic style of writing. [as shown on page 186-7]. The Egyptians were the only people in the Moabi region who had an available writing surface (papyri), and its associated writing tools of pens and inks. When Ancient Egypt lost power in Asia, there was no one to maintain a literate Mudar Language, and as a result no more than a handful of written texts were found, because writing was/is not part of the nomadic life – a fact that was also affirmed by Ibn Khaldun in his Muqaddima, as shown in the last chapter of this book.”"
So now we understand clearer when it says that Prophet Mohammed spoke to the angel Gabri'el who had to have been speaking the same exact language that Prophet Mohammed spoke, which is, the Mudar, the language of the Angels as Gabri'el is cited as a major angel in all religions and Gnostic teachings from all walks. Those of the Mohammedan portion of Islam should be seeking to unify with us instead of fighting with us on this issue and debasing their own laws by doubting Allah and calling Prophet Noble Drew Ali a false prophet, something that was said of every prophet of old but the proofs are in the works, not in the mere words of man. He proved that he was in fact a Prophet and an Angel of Allah made manifest and he brought the undeniable, indisputable, unequivocal facts about our people that none, not from the Mohammedan portion of Islam, or any other branch of Islam before the Prophet Noble Drew Ali, of After the Prophet Drew Ali, nor any Afrocentric scholar this day, or other theologian had revealed to us here in the west and basically the world.
We can even look at the ethnicity of Prophet Mohammed and his family to prove further how this messenger of Allah looked and who his bloodline is tied to and further prove that the Moors are the true and divine founders of the Islamic creed.
As you can see by the two pictures above, just like everything else that belonged to the original people of the planet, specifically us Moors, the evasive element of European psychology crept into, and eventually took over Islam and it is the form that we have today where men do not believe as the Koran says and that is, on the judgement day, Allah will deal justice to the transgressors, instead, these types of Mohammedans think it prudent to strap bombs to their chests and blow themselves up as to say that Allah is weak and has no power to destroy the wicked, and so now they have to take it in their hands. Surely, they too will have their day. As mentioned earlier, Wesley Muhammad, Phd, the foremost scholar of Islam and pre-Islamic studies among us in the United States, who has written many works on this topic like Black Arabia, and, in several works that can be found published online and via his facebook page, thus proving without a shadow of a doubt the ethnicity of the Prophet Mohammed and how the end time Prophet would look.
As part of the ‘Great Tafsirs of the Holy Qur’an Project’ the Royal Aal al-Bayt Institute of Islamic Thought of Amman, Jordan published in 2008 an English translation of one of the most important works in "ulum al-Qur’an" or the Sciences of the Qur’an, Ali ibn Ahmad al-Wahidi’s (d. 468/1075) Asbab al-Nuzul. This text records the available ‘occasions of revelation,’ i.e. those hadith reports that describe the reasons for and the particular circumstances of individual revelations or verses of the Qur’an. Al-Wahidi’s discussion of Surat al-Baqara : 79 is critical. The aya or verse reads:
“So woe to those who write the scripture with their own hands, then say, ‘This is from Allah,’ in order to exchange it for a small price. Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn.” 2:79
According to the tafsirs or commentaries on the Qur’an, the issue at stake that caused this verse to be revealed was the physical appearance of the Prophet Muhammad. The Tanwir al-Miqbās min Tafsir Ibn 'Abbās reports:
“it is said this means: a valley in hell (be unto those who write the Scripture with their hands) [and] change the description and traits of Muhammad (pbuh) in the Book.”
Likewise Tafsir al-Jalalayn affirms:
“These are the Jews, the ones that altered the description of the Prophet in the Torah, as well as the ‘stoning’ verse, and other details, and rewrote them in a way different from that in which they were revealed.”
How was the description of the Prophet changed? Al-Wahidi provides the startling, but extremely important answer:
"(Therefore woe be unto those who write the Scripture with their hands and then say, “This is from Allah”…) [2:79]. This was revealed about those who had changed the description of the Prophet, Allah bless him and give him peace, and altered his traits. Al-Kalbi mentioned, through the above-mentioned chain of transmission: “They had changed the description of Allah’s Messenger, Allah bless him and give him peace, in their Scripture.They made him white and tall while the Prophet, Allah bless him and give him peace, was brown and of medium height. hey had said to their followers and companions: ‘Look at the description of the prophet who will be sent at the end of time; his description does not match that of this [man]’. The Jewish rabbis and doctors used to gain some worldly benefits from the Jewish people and so they were afraid of losing this gain if they were ever to show the real description. It is for this reason that they had changed it”.
The sabab or reason for Allah revealing 2:79 thus is that Jewish rabbis, in order to deny Muhammad and thereby not lose their position among their people, changed the description of the coming End Time Apostle of God that is found in their scriptures. According to this report, both the Prophet Muhammad and the End Time Man of God were asmar or brown complexioned, the very same complexion of Noble Drew Ali who in our Moorish Holy Koran wrote a chapter called "The end times and the fulfilling of the prophecies". But the Jews, in order to avoid having to follow the brown-skinned Prophet from Mecca, changed the description of Ahmad found in their Torah; they changed it from “brown, medium height” to “tall and white”! Jews were thus the first to fabricate the ‘White Ahmad/Muhammad’ image – according to this report - and they began the process of concealing Muhammad's true description.
This report from al-Wahidi’s famous work makes four important points:
1.] Proper knowledge of the complexion of the Prophet is important to Allah Himself, who revealed a Qur’anic verse in order to correct the improper information about his servants’ complexion that had been fabricated by disbelievers.
2.] Muhammad of Arabia was (dark) brown-skinned (asmar) and the Apostle of God named Ahmad/Muhammad who is prophesied in the Torah to appear at the End of Time is likewise expected to be brown-skinned.
3.] Muhammad was not "white" – neither of them.
4.] The fabricated ‘White Muhammad’ actually originated with disbelieving Jews, though it will later become apart of the Al-Islamic orthodoxy.
Zayd b. Haritha (d. 629) was the Prophet’s adopted son and likely the first male to accept Islam after the Prophet. He was, like Bilal, intensely dark-skinned or thusly described by early Arabic scholars who picked up the Europeans misnaming us as "black". He, therefore would have looked like Bilal in complexion. Zayd even had a flat nose, something Bilal didn’t even have. Because of his short stature, dark skin and flat nose, Zayd has occasionally been mistaken as “a negro,” i.e., dark skinned woolly haired Moor. Dr John Henrik Clark even claimed that both Bilal and Zayd were Ethiopians. Zayd was a true Arabian from the Arab tribe Banu Kalb. He preceded Bilal in Islam.
Ali b. Abi Talib (d. 661) was the first-cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet. Many claim that it was he, not Zayd, who was the first male convert to Islam after Prophet Muhammad. Whether the first or the second convert, these two both preceded Bilal. And like Zayd, Ali was intensely dark. He too is described with precisely the same complexion as Bilal. ‘Ali’s own son, Abu Ja’far Muhammad, according to Ibn Sa’d (d. 845), described ‘Ali thusly: “He was a black-skinned man with big, heavy eyes, pot-bellied, bald, and kind of short.” ‘Ali’s descendants, the sharifs/sayyids, were similarly described as so called "black-skinned." Zayd and Ali were thus Moorish (misnomer black) Moslems before Bilal. As Robert F. Spencer remarks: “It is said that the Quraysh explained their short stature and dark skin by the fact that they always carefully adhered to endogamy.” [Robert F. Spencer, “The Arabian Matriarchate: An Old Controversy,” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 8 (Winter, 1952) 488.] Al-Jahiz (d. 869), the important Afro-Iraqi scholar of ninth century Baghdad, noted in his Fakhr al-sudan 'ala al-bidan, “The Boast of the Blacks over the Whites”:
"The ten lordly sons of 'Abd al-Mutãalib were deep black (dalham) in color and big/tall (dukhm). When Amir b. al-Tufayl saw them circumambulating (the Ka'ba) like dark camels, he said, “With such men as these is the custody of the Ka'ba preserved.” 'Abd Allah b. 'Abbas was very black and tall. Those of Abu Talib’s family, who are the most noble of men, are more or less black (sud).”
The are so many other sources that we can touch on for this particular page but for now, we will conclude with what the actual records say as opposed to dogmatic zealots as proof is truth and contemporary sources gives us clear evidences of the very image and description of Prophet Mohammed and deeper understanding of why the Prophet Noble Drew Ali said"Islam is yours, that is why you don't recognize it".The Moorish American Moslems of the Moorish Science Temple of America derives their power and authority from the Great Koran of Mecca.
The Islamism of the Moors, that is, that old time religion, merged with modern elements and customs which maintain righteousness, and eliminates extreme elements of the Mohammedan religion that may have been used 1400 years ago. The Koran of Mohammed speaks in "now time" terms meaning "in those times" predicated upon a time when men had slaves and there were rules governing slaves, and when you could cut someones feet and hands off for stealing (5:38), or whip a man in the streets for bearing false witness against an adultering wife (24:4), even the beating of your woman with a light stick is allowed (4:34). Surely, in this day and age, particularly in western society, such extremes are not tolerated nor needed and this is why Allah sent Prophet Noble Drew Ali to this earth with a new message for these days and times and we were given the secrets that found their first light of day among the ancient Moorish rulers of the world, hidden among other branches of humanity when the Moors become fell from their high station and thus subject to their offspring currently called the "races of men." Allah now speaks to man through the heart of man and we are left with reminders in the form of governing law and this is why we draw our power and authority from the Great Koran of Mohammed because we know that within it, bespeaks the original laws of Prophet Mohammed as handed him by the Angel in human flesh, Gabri'el. We united these laws with the laws handed us by our Prophet for the teaching and instructing of Moorish Americans etc. for these days and times. This is Islamism, modern day Islam founded upon that old time religion whose principles are Love Truth Peace Freedom and Justice. This writer offers up a challenge to any of the Mohammedan "orthodoxy" to refute the above claims. Islam is in fact yours, founded by the ancient Moors who were the descendants of Canaan.
"Before the end of time, every knee will bow to Islam" ~ Prophet Noble Drew Ali
Complied by Sheik Way-El
Grand Sheik and Divine Minister
Moorish Science Temple of America
Subordinate Temple Atlantis
1. Baladhuri, Ansab al-ashraf, ed. Muhammad Hamid Allah (Cairo: Dar al-Ma’arif, 1987) I:193.
2. Ibn Sa’d, al-Tabaqat al-kubr, III/i, 30; Baladhuri, Ansab al-ashraf, I:470; Al-Tabari,Ta’rikh al-rusul wa’l-muluk, XIII: 2301; Ibn ‘Asakir, Ta’rikh madinat Dimashq, ed. Umar Gharamah ‘Amrawi (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1995) XIV:351. See also Ibn al-Jawzī, Kitāb tanwīr al-ghabash fī fa∙l ‘l-sūdān wa’l-Èabash, ed. and trns. by Imran Hamza Alawiye, “Ibn al-Jawzī’s Apologia on Behalf of the Black People and their status in Islam: A Critical Editon and Translation ofKitāb tanwīr al-ghabash fī fa∙l ‘l-sūdān wa’l-Èabash,” (PhD. Dissertation, University of London, 1985) 298 [Ar.]; 132 [Eng.]; Khalid Muhammad Khalid, Men Around the Messenger (New Revised Edition; Kuala Lumpur, 2005) 232.
3. E.g. J.A. Rogers, World’s Great Men of Color 2 vols. (New York: Collier Books, 1996 ) II: 539-40; idem, Sex and Race: Negro-Caucasian Mixing in All Ages and All Lands (St. Petersburg, Fl: Helga M. Rogers, 1967; 9th edition) 96; Vasudeo B. Mehto, “If Europe had been Muslimised,” Islamic Review 2 (1932): 220.
4. Al-Suyuti, Tārikh al-khulafā, 134.
5. Ibn Sa’d, al-Tabaqāt al-kubrā (Beirut: Dar Sadir) 8:25.
Ibn al-SabbAgh, Al-Fusul al-muhimmah fi ma’rifat ahwa l-a’ummah (Najaf: Dar al-Kutub al-Tijariyah, 1950); Tariq Berry, Unknown Arabs and Tariq Berry, “A True Description of the Prophet Mohamed's Family (SAWS),” http://savethetruearabs.blogspot.com/2009/08/true-description-of-prophet-mohameds_26.html.